Integrated Application Platform › Forums › General › ? Bug in key – lower › Re: Re: ? Bug in key – lower
May 26, 2013 at 2:06 am #976
I have removed support for “lower” indexes since they weren’t fully implemented.
My plan is to allow indexing a rule (which could do lower). This has the advantage that you have a way to access the original field(s) as well as the transformed field. One issue is that if you modify the code of the rule, then the index has to be rebuilt, but this is hard to detect automatically.